Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finland–Moldova relations

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closed a bit early per WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

=[[Finland–Moldova relations]]=

:{{la|Finland–Moldova relations}} ([{{fullurl:Finland–Moldova relations|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finland–Moldova relations}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

non resident embassies. very little coverage of relations except on the football field. [http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?q=finland+moldova+-football&ned=au&hl=en&scoring=r] in any case most relations are in Moldova-EU context. LibStar (talk) 12:17, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - They don't even have an embassy in the country. Nothing indicates notability. Shadowjams (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete for lack of significant, independent coverage of the topic. - Biruitorul Talk 22:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Stubs on bilateral relations of X and Y which would be better covered by "Foreign relations of X" and "Foreign relations of Y," thus including the same info with 200 articles rather than 20,000 stubs. Wikipedia is not a directory. The websites of the foreign ministries will always be better sources than these stale robostubs. Edison (talk) 23:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete One of the 37,000+ potential articles on bilateral relations which has not shown notability of the subject. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 05:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  • NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, and merging these articles like this into the diplomacy of articles. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete since i find no reliable sources that discuss this relationship. The article as it currently stands has one primary source -- the moldovan foriegn ministry -- to establish the fact that moldova does not even bother keeping an embassy in Finland.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete or possible Merge. Google and GNews searches throw a fair few pages up but most of it's just clutter. The only useful source I found was the Finnish foreign ministry acknowledging Moldova's independence but nothing more. I suppose it could be merged into the diplomatic relations articles of the respectivce countries since relations exist but are simply nto well enough documented for an article. HJMitchell You rang? 11:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete About as clear a case as can be imagined. "NEW EVENTS" do not affect the normal processes here at all. In fact, they make the need to remove the weeds quite apparent. (consider this posted in all similar AfDs) Collect (talk) 11:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete No independent coverage of the stated article topic. --BlueSquadronRaven 16:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.