Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Rand Limited

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Non-Admin Closure, withdrawn by nominator with no outstanding delete votes ~~ GB fan ~~ 18:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

=[[First Rand Limited]]=

:{{la|First Rand Limited}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:First Rand Limited}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|First Rand Limited}})

Fails wp:NOTE, possibly promotional. At first, I feared a copyvio, but it does not appear to be the case. Problem w/the refs. Of the 4 refs provided, 2 are from the company website; refs 3 & 4 are the same Google Finance page result. I am not seeing notability established. The Eskimo (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Comment as Nom: I withdraw my deletion nomination for this article. Ref's have been added as well as inter-Wiki links, and, quite honestly, after reviewing the list of banks in Africa and Europe, I believe my understanding of the notability threshold for banks was incorrect, and is perhaps lower than for corporations. Whatever the case, I would support admin closure as keep, as I am uncertain if it is correct to simply remove the deletion tag myself. The Eskimo (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.