Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FishTanked
=[[FishTanked]]=
:{{la|FishTanked}} – (
:({{Find sources|FishTanked}})
Non-notable web comic, which I can't find mention of in any reliable sources Sadads (talk) 21:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Comment If "the comic was featured in several major publications, including USA Today, The Register, The Guardian" is true, the comic would be certainly notable. --Novil Ariandis (talk) 22:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::However, the unavailability of sources which support such an assertion makes it questionable.Sadads (talk) 23:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
:::Delete until then. --Novil Ariandis (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I found examples of what "featured in several major publications" means, and it means trivial coverage, like at most two sentences. This "brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of Internet addresses" is explicitly described as trivial coverage not meeting notability by WP:WEB. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 14:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.