Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisheries Society of Bangladesh

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Fisheries Society of Bangladesh]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Fisheries Society of Bangladesh}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Fisheries Society of Bangladesh}})

Searches of the usual types in English and Bengali found press releases and directory listings, but no significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources. The society's work may be good and important, especially to those connected with it, but the organization is not notable (not a suitable topic for a stand alone Wikipedia article). Worldbruce (talk) 13:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Science, and Bangladesh. Worldbruce (talk) 13:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. Obviously the page itself needs to have sources added. What persuades me towards keep is that the organisation is quoted quite a lot as part of the CV or similar of people, e.g. [https://wcfs.fisheries.org/9th-wfc-international-program-committee/ membership], [https://aqua-centre.org/conferences talks], [https://bsmrau.edu.bd/sabuj/other-activities/ award] and [https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-251X Orcid] entries as examples. (There are many more of these.) This indicates that it has enough stature that people mention it, albeit this is not as strong as specific articles on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldm1954 (talkcontribs) 15:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
  • :Do you have any evidence that there are sources that cover this organization? WP:NORG requires sources, not just membership number claims or the existence of conferences they've hosted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:25, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:25, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Step Sideways (talk) 23:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.