Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flavien Darius Pommier

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Flavien Darius Pommier}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Flavien Darius Pommier}})

I believe the subject fails WP:GNG as there's just not enough significant in depth coverage - out of 8 refs currently presented 2 are barely acceptable as they are from Forbes contributors, 1 (no7) doesn't mention the subject at all, 2 are about selling virtual vine (not about the subject himself), 2 about his partnerships. I have found [https://www.superyachts.com/lifestyle/story/breathing-new-life-the-hadid-wine-label-11227/ this], but the source looks questionable to me. Generally there's more info about the vineyard rather than the person. Less Unless (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Noting the author's comment on the talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Source assessment does of major press coverage from talk page does not find that any of the provided articles meet WP:GNG. See table below. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

{{ source assess table |

{{ source assess

| source = [https://www.forbes.com/sites/katiebell/2018/03/19/how-instagram-gave-a-small-bordeaux-winery-global-exposure/#7e38c7d95326 Forbes US Full interview]

| ind = n

| ind_just = WP:INTERVIEW about self

| rel = n

| rel_just = WP:FORBESCON

| sig = y

| sig_just =

}}

{{ source assess

| source = [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2021/05/04/french-vineyard-sells-virtual-wine-300/ Telegraph Interview]

| ind = n

| ind_just = WP:INTERVIEW about self

| rel = y

| rel_just =

| sig = y

| sig_just =

}}

{{ source assess

| source = [https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/worklife/g34280474/best-celebrity-wines/ Cosmopolitan]

| ind = y

| ind_just =

| rel = n

| rel_just = WP:RSP treats Cosmopolitan on a case by case basis and this author does not appear to have qualifications to judge "best wines"

| sig = n

| sig_just = List article

}}

{{ source assess

| source = [https://www.standard.co.uk/reveller/foodanddrink/mother-s-day-food-and-drink-gifts-b922662.html Evening Standard]

| ind = ?

| ind_just = Article seems to be WP:PROMO especially with links to sites and prices

| rel = n

| rel_just = WP:RSP treats Evening Standard on a case by case basis and and this author does not appear to have qualifications to judge "best wines"

| sig = n

| sig_just = List Article

}}

{{ source assess

| source = [https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/money-for-nothing-inside-the-high-stakes-world-of-nfts-mb2mtvjmt Times UK]

| ind = y

| ind_just =

| rel = y

| rel_just =

| sig = n

| sig_just = Just appears to be mentioning subject's NFT in relation to other NFTs

}}

{{ source assess

| source = [https://www.forbes.com/sites/tmullen/2018/10/30/the-2018-bordeaux-vintage-may-be-poised-for-greatness/?sh=332e19eed02d Forbes US]

| ind = y

| ind_just =

| rel = n

| rel_just = WP:FORBESCON

| sig = n

| sig_just = Mostly about the vineyard not the subject

}}

{{ source assess

| source = [https://www.lofficiel.be/nl/hommes/geef-met-vaderdag-cadeau-elke-man L'Official]

| ind = y

| ind_just =

| rel = ?

| rel_just = Unsure about reliability of this French source

| sig = n

| sig_just = Even without knowing French this just appears to be a list article with little to say on the subject

}}

{{ source assess

| source = [https://www.decanter.com/wine-news/opinion/guest-blog/nfts-and-wine-tech-462952/ Decant]

| ind = y

| ind_just =

| rel = ?

| rel_just = Unsure about source's reliability

| sig = n

| sig_just = Passing mention

}}

}}

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.