Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleming Way (2nd nomination)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
=[[Fleming Way]]=
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleming Way}}
:{{la|Fleming Way}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Fleming Way}})
An entirely non notable road, plus a bus guide in violation of WP:NOT. Safiel (talk) 05:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Utterly non-notable and could have been speedied per the previous AfD to save time, but such is Wikipedian bureaucracy. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOT.Charles (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
:*Comment I don't understand the reasoning behind the decline of CSD G4. It is the essentially the same non noteworthy article. Safiel (talk) 18:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
::I appreciate that you can't see the deleted version but the two articles are not at all alike. The deleted version only noted that it was named after a footballer and that a local football ground is nearby. Unlike the current article it didn't mention buses at all. G4 requires that the articles be "sufficiently identical" and they weren't. Furthermore the AfD is from 2006, which might as well be ancient history as far as Wikipedia is concerned. I've seen people object to G4 being used to enforce AfDs that are more than a year or two old, never mind eight years. It may well be that the subject still isn't notable, and the article doesn't include any new evidence of notability, but AfD is the right forum for evaluating that. Hut 8.5 21:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete not notable + uncited. Transasia07 (talk) 02:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.