Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fletcher Field Strength

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete WP:SNOW clear hoax. --Salix alba (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

=[[Fletcher Field Strength]]=

:{{la|Fletcher Field Strength}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Suspected hoax. Google returns no hits. gb ^{(t, c)} 21:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete Appears to be a hoax per total lack of hits. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete. If it is an SI unit but Google is silent, there is a fairly good chance that it is a hoax. Kakofonous (talk) 00:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete - the claim is that it is an SI base unit which it is not since [http://www.bipm.org/en/si/base_units/ these] are the SI base units. -- Whpq (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete made up unit, given references in the article do not support the existence of the unit. --Salix alba (talk) 18:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.