Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flintloque

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 21:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Flintloque]]=

:{{la|Flintloque}} ([{{fullurl:Flintloque|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flintloque}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Not notable, article was tagged in April and no sources have been added since then to make article conform with guidelines for notability. Repeated searches turned up no reliable sources regarding this article's subject. Article also appears to be advertising for the product as well as retailers selling it, which may in part explain its provenance. Wolfhound1000 (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Merge a severely pruned version to the company's article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete article has no sources and my own search brought up no reliable sources. The company's wiki page seems to have even more problems than this page of one of its products so would suggest that a merge is not in order here. Jewish-wargamer (talk) 21:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete search brought up nothing reliable in terms of sourses, zip in google books either. Prussian-Hussar (talk) 20:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.