Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floppy Cube

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. We can't merge to an article that doesn't exist yet. Sandstein 06:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Floppy Cube]]=

:{{la|Floppy Cube}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Floppy Cube}})

Seemingly NN puzzle/toy. The article relies 100% on a WP:SPS for all content related to this item and I've been unable to find any other in-depth coverage from anything resembling a WP:RS other than [https://www.popsci.com/rubiks-cube-for-beginners-experts/ a passing mention in Popular Science]. Toddst1 (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Weak Merge to some new article of Rubik's Cube variants, along with articles like Alexander's Star and Skewb Diamond. The concept of toys similar to Rubik's Cube is notable, though this specific one doesn't appear to be individually notable. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete. I'm honestly surprised there isn't any significant coverage in reliable sources, but when there's no RS there's no RS. casualdejekyll (talk) 17:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.