Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Brudenell-Bruce

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

=[[Florence Brudenell-Bruce]]=

:{{la|Florence Brudenell-Bruce}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Florence Brudenell-Bruce}})

Her claim to notability appears to stem from her former relationships with Prince Harry and Jenson Button. However notability is not inherited, and I can find no reason why she should be regarded as notable in her own right. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

I was considering the same thing. I feel her notability is not considered established enough for a wikipedia page. Arnoldxmidnight (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2011 (UTC) Comment from blocked sock puppet struck. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Comment Arnoldxmidnight has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts by using the following sock puppets to edit this and other articles:-

Pjw89 and Franticjay. all have now been blocked from editing. Richard Harvey (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Strong delete no notability other than two bit parts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.191.118.34 (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. I'm reluctantly going for a second relisting, since this is a BLP and we need to get a clear determination of consensus.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.