Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florencia Daud

:{{la|Florencia Daud}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Florencia Daud}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Florencia Daud}})

BLP with no sources available to support any claim for notability. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

• There's an employment history, and a nefarious claim to be an expert. Unless something is found then delete, actually, this would qualify for speedy deletion as not asserting notability.--Scott Mac 11:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

• I second this deletion! --User talk:Erocifellerskank —Preceding undated comment added 13:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC).

I support deletion of this page. Florencia runs several businesses that prey on English speaking visitors to Argentina. The Trip Advisor Travel Forum for Buenos Aires and BA EXpat forum have current threads detailing alleged attempts to bilk foreigners out of rental deposits. Without evidence that she actually has the degrees or experience she claims, Wiki is unwittingly contributing to the credibility of a very shady character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr dawggy (talk • contribs) 22:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

• Idelete - after looking on google (nothing much for notability) I think it is a candidate for speedying, but we can let it run tis course. Could be miselading if what I read elsewhere is true. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:V to say nothing of WP:BIO. Ray^Talk 13:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
• Delete - support speedy also, results from my search left me wondering if it was a fictitious person. Anyways, there is from my search or in the article now, no WP:RS supported assertion of WP:NOTABILITY - 15:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Off2riorob (talk)
• As nom, I won't object to speedy deletion - at some point it will likely turn into WP:SNOW. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

• This page should be deleted. The claims are unfounded and unproven, and therefore it should be deleted. That's not to mention the fact that there are good, upstanding members of the community who claim this lady is involved in an apartment rental deposit scam, leading credence to the probability that she wrote her own article and made everything up.--Jasonphos (talk) 14:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.