Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florenze(Constructed Language)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per below. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Florenze(Constructed Language)]]=

:{{la|Florenze(Constructed Language)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Florenze(Constructed_Language) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Florenze(Constructed Language)}})

No indication of notability. I am not certain that CSD A11 is applicable, so taking to AfD. Article was previously PRODed and declined. Safiel (talk) 05:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Comment The editor who created the page, {{u|Redwars22}}, is the same person who submitted the material to [http://conworkshop.info/view_language.php?l=FLZ here] on October 3, so it's almost certain that the person who created the page is also the language's creator. On a side note I also note that the creator of the language is nearly identical to the two people who created [http://redstack.tk/ Redstack], a fictitious company that creates "animated series, apps for your devices, blogs and apps about linguistics." I think it's likely that this is directly related given Redstack's emphasis on linguistics, the similarity in the creator name, and that Redwards22 is the same as one of the other fictitious companies listed on the Redstack page. This seems like it would certainly qualify for WP:A11. I'm willing to speedy it and defend it at DRV, if it came to that. Redwars22, Wikipedia is not a place to spread awareness of something you came up with one day. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

:*I debated blocking them for a promotional username, however the company names aren't for anything real so I'm not going to - however the warning that Wikipedia is not a place to write about or promote things you created are still applicable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Comment: I'm going to go ahead and just delete this as something that the user created one day. I wanted to wait and see how others responded, but then went on vacation and didn't check Wikipedia. There's enough evidence here to suggest that this was something that was created by the editor and that this is their way of trying to promote their own work. It's cool that they came up with their own language, but Wikipedia is not the place to promote something that you came up with WP:ONEDAY. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.