Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fool's Bargain
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Star Wars books#Survivor's Quest. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 04:11, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
=[[Fool's Bargain]]=
:{{la|Fool's Bargain}} – (
:({{Find sources|Fool's Bargain}})
Non-notable novel. Article is plot-heavy and fails to establish notabilityNathan121212 (talk) 06:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to List_of_Star_Wars_books#Survivor.27s_Quest. I can't really find any reviews or coverage for this, so a redirect is the best scenario here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
::No coverage, that's why it should be deleted. Not worth a redirect, nobody is looking for this. Nathan121212 (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
::*Redirects are cheap and the article had about 500 views last month, so it's conceivable that someone will look for this article. Because of that, a redirect is fairly reasonable. The book doesn't merit an article, but there's no reason not to redirect. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:00, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect per Tokyogirl79. Nobody knows who nobody is. VMS Mosaic (talk) 11:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to List_of_Star_Wars_books#Survivor.27s_Quest The book does not meet notability requirements, but if its getting views then the article might as well be turned into a redirect towards an appropriate section. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 22:51, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.