Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fool Me Twice

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Fool Me Twice]]=

:{{la|Fool Me Twice}} ([{{fullurl:Fool Me Twice|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fool Me Twice}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Genuine but non-notable privately made film—fails Wikipedia:Notability (films) - "released for free online via Google Video". References are all either links to the original or mirrors of the Google video, or links to unrelated news stories. With exception of [http://www.agit-doc.org/foolmetwice_film.html this] not a single mention of the film by an outside source. Much is made of Google viewing data, but other than a single week in Australia in Nov 2008[http://video.google.com.au/videorankings?cr=aus&hl=en&type=viewed&range=w2008-11-14&start=30], it seems to have slipped back into relative obscurity. Was created by a single-purpose account User:Policies in December 2008 and linked to the 2002 Bali bombings article by a new user [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2002_Bali_bombings&diff=prev&oldid=257451553] at about the same time. Article has had no substantive edits by anyone else. Djanga 06:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Merge into Indonesian Australian relations article - with a proviso with the text or a footnote the conspiracy theory element to identify as such. The Indonesian and Australia projects have been fortunate not to have too many limited range articles regarding their relations - the essence of the material covered in the film needs to be inserted into another article - as I agree with the WP:N issue for such a film SatuSuro 09:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete yet another online "viral" video that had a small, brief blip of internet popularity and was quickly forgotten. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 10:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete A low quality internet video that appears to use no original source material and features a number of questionable conspiracy theories. Glebesam (talk) 06:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: non-notable video. JamesBurns (talk) 09:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.