Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forecastfox (fix version)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Forecastfox (fix version)]]=

:{{la|1=Forecastfox (fix version)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Forecastfox (fix version)}})

No reliable independent sources to show notability. Was PROD'ed before (the reason: {{tq|Not notable; I can find only passing mentions and spam.}}), PROD was reverted with the summary: {{tq|a quick search finds several}}. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, Internet, and Software. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Delete - Also unable to find reliable sources for notability. Most results are just sites that reupload downloads or forum posts or brief mentions. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NSOFT. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Weak delete - [https://www.pcworld.com/article/486314/forecastfox_weather_for_chrome.html], [https://www.computerworld.com/article/2543495/20-must-have-firefox-extensions.html?page=4], and [https://www.wiley.com/en-au/Linux+Smart+Homes+For+Dummies-p-9780764598234] are RS reviews, though two of them are in listicles, and it's likely that it would have had further reviews so it could be turned into a somewhat better article. On the other hand, there's going to be a multitude of browser extensions with similarly marginal levels of coverage, the article is an orphan (despite having apparently once been de-orphaned), I can't see an obvious limited merge target, and even if there were further reviews there's not much that can be usefully said about it that an internet search wouldn't give. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 03:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.