Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forexpros

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Forexpros]]=

:{{la|Forexpros}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Forexpros}})

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Forexpros. Seems to be nothing more than Non-Notable Self-promotion, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 05:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 05:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete All references given are self-referential. Google News search finds only articles BY Forexpros (written under its byline, or promoting its seminars); I found absolutely nothing ABOUT Forexpros by independent sources. --MelanieN (talk) 15:19, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.