Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortuna (captured ships)(1805 - 1812)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Fortuna (captured ships)(1805 - 1812)]]=

:{{la|1=Fortuna (captured ships)(1805 - 1812)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Fortuna (captured ships)(1805 - 1812)}})

Overly specific list that fails WP:SALAT. Move over, one-eyed horse thieves from Montana. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete The intersection of "ships named Fortuna" and "ships captured between 1805 and 1812" is to my eye self-evidently a WP:Non-encyclopedic cross-categorization, and as such WP:DELREASON#14 ({{tq|Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia}}) applies. It is perhaps an amusing coincidence that there are so many, but it doesn't seem to be a topic that is either encyclopaedic or notable—though admittedly I don't quite know how best to go about looking for sources for this, so if somebody else finds sources that I wasn't able to, I'd be happy to reconsider. TompaDompa (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete This is far too specific. (JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 03:11, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete. That there were so many merchant ships named Fortuna is presumably unsurprising, given the meaning. As it stands, unless some source is available that discusses these captures as a cohesive topic, this does not meet any of the criteria for a standalone list. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.