Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foxy boxing

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sourced, releant topic. Need some cleanup, though. Tone 11:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

=[[Foxy boxing]]=

:{{la|Foxy boxing}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Foxy boxing}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Foxy boxing}})

Article 90% passing mentions in popular culture. Also not notable. cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 17:25, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Keep Good sources for this topic do exist. You gotta love the title [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=opYA03qIQPYC&pg=PA40 Good with Their Hands]! Colonel Warden (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep: the article needs drastic improvement, but the subject clearly passes the notability criteria, as demonstrated above and [http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks%3A1&tbo=1&q=foxy+boxing&btnG=Search+Books in this Google Books search], which provides a great deal of information about the history and origins of this form of entertainment. -- The Anome (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep no question of notability. coverage abounds, e.g., [http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=LA&p_theme=la&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EDA8817D01DE281&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM][http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/TRIBnet/access/852727401.html?dids=852727401:852727401&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jun+03%2C+2005&author=ED+MURRIETA&pub=News+Tribune&desc=Put+up+your+very+large+mitts+%3B+Boxing+babes%3F+Burgers+and+beer%3F+A+hot+tub%3F+It%27s+all+good%2C+clean+pugilistic+fun+at+The+Ram.&pqatl=google]-- Milowent • ^talkblp-r 12:54, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep Before nominating something for deletion, please use Google news archive search. This gets ample coverage. Click the link at the top of the AFD to see it. Dream Focus 16:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{tl|rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong ^spout 18:22, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep - Appears to be getting some notice in the press, although these sources need to be cited in the article. The entire "In media and popular culture" section should be deleted. SnottyWong ^spout 18:22, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep I've finished adding some references to the article to back up the explanations above. It's definitely a notable article subject. Silver seren^C 17:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

*Keep. Oh yeah, noticed in the media, and its "really hot" besides that. Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Keep Article provides the reliable and verifiable sources needed to establish notability. Alansohn (talk) 03:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.