Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frøken Kirkemus

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Frøken Kirkemus}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Frøken Kirkemus}})

Unreferenced film article. Not clear that this passes WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. As a {{u|Lugnuts}} created stub this could have been deleted through a WP:PROD (as many of his articles have already after the Wikipedia:ARBCOM outcome), but I figured I'd give the community a shot to comment (rescue it?) by taking it here. Best.4meter4 (talk) 04:11, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 04:11, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:20, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• Comment So far after some searching I have found this https://www.danskefilm.dk/film.php?id=162 which is sourced on the Danish version of the film's page. This link to the source material https://archive.org/details/froeken-kirkemus-1941. I expect it is based on Beauty and the Boss and its source, the Hungarian play, but I don't read Danish so searching through newspapers would not be easy for me. This website[https://www.dfi.dk/viden-om-film/filmdatabasen/film/froken-kirkemus] says that it premiered 26 December 1941 or 1 January 1942 to help narrow down any newspaper searches. Searching with the abbreviation Frk. may be helpful as well. I will continue to look. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• :This newspaper search [https://www2.statsbiblioteket.dk/mediestream/avis/search/Fr%C3%B8ken%20Kirkemus%20anmeldelse/date/1941-12-25%2C2024-08-02] shows 8 hits, if someone has login access and can check if any of them are worthwhile that might help. Moritoriko (talk) 06:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: Added things, including very significant coverage in Gyldendals danske filmguide. Remade the same year in Swedish, same lead actress, which has, even without considering the coverage existing both in Danish and Swedish, the film pass WP:NFIC as an important part in the career of a notable (film) personality. -Mushy Yank. 07:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• :How is it an important part of Viby's career? It's not the only movie she did in Sweden nor the only Danish to Swedish movie. The Gyldendals book has a lot of words but what does it say that is significant? I think that qualifies for 1 of 2 non-trivial publications more than 5 years after its release. Moritoriko (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• ::Other sources indicate the role contributed to Viby's image. -Mushy Yank. 14:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 07:29, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
• Weak keep per Mushy Yank. There are signs of WP:SIGCOV here that persuade me that sources exist in other languages. If I'm wrong, this can be merged or mentioned somewhere, perhaps with the director(s). Shooterwalker (talk) 01:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. In addition to what Mushy Yank writes above, [https://tidningar.kb.se/search?q=%22Fr%C3%B6ken%20Kyrkr%C3%A5tta%22&searchGranularity=part&from=1941-01-01&to=1941-12-31 there seems to have been] decent coverage in Swedish newspapers in 1941. For copyright reasons, I can't access the full articles from home, but we see enough snippets to see that the reviews exist, together with a related court case (and a lot of irrelevant listings of movies being screened, of course). /Julle (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.