Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractured (miniseries)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Fractured (miniseries)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Fractured (miniseries)}})

Technically a second nomination, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractured (Mini-series) was the first (and the article creator then re-created it under this title a month later, seemingly about an hour after re-creating it under the original title and getting G4-ed). My Before revealed no sources discussing this web series in any great detail past routine announcements, and while the current sources look ok at first glance, but one is independent.

• [https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/03/16/23/francine-seth-to-star-in-a-new-project-fractured][https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/09/18/23/all-fractured-episodes-to-stream-on-youtube][https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/09/08/23/francine-seth-show-more-mature-side-in-fractured][https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/08/26/23/vacation-to-die-for-fractured-full-trailer-released] were all written by the production company, which has a financial incentive to write about their own shows.
• [https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/1972807/davao/entertainment/francine-and-seths-dream-vacation-gone-wrong-in-fractured] appears independent, but scrolling to the bottom shows the letters PR in bold at the bottom. That, the tone, and the lack of an author byline means I'm confident saying that this is a Press Release.
• [https://www.manilatimes.net/2023/09/08/entertainment-lifestyle/show-times/fractured-franseths-swift-follow-up-to-dirty-linen/1909041] is the only okayish source, but the first few lines (only part I can access) show that it's just regurgitating the press release, with no attempts at a review, commentary, or discussion past the premise. It doesn't show notability, but even if it did it would be one source. That's simply not enough.

And yes, I did consider a G4, but it's been a year and I have no idea what the original article looked like. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 09:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 09:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

:Delete and salt. Previous AfD demonstrated that the user kept moving article back into article namespace after being repeatedly moved into draftspace, one time even while the AfD was ongoing. I don't trust the creator to not do the same thing here again. Sources also do not demonstrate notability. Procyon117 (talk) 09:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

• Redirect to List_of_iWantTFC_original_programming#Drama: opposed to deletion given cast and production coverage. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
• :Please dont revert the edit for IP address 2001:4453:6AC:6F00:1035:EE0B:CAB2:8F28 (talk) 12:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
• ::2001:4453:6AC:6F00:1035:EE0B:CAB2:8F28, your edit to the article up for deletion, was reverted by myself, on the grounds that you removed the AFD template from an active discussion. AFD templates and messages must not be removed until the discussion is closed. Please familiarise yourself with the rules, and if you wish to dispute the deletion, you're better to do it here, than by preventing people from finding the discussion. Dane|Geld 17:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.