Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frames and distance

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Frames and distance]]=

:{{la|Frames and distance}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Frames_and_distance Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Frames and distance}})

Procedural nomination as per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Frames and distance.

Pinging {{u|Mccapra}}, the nom. I am neutral on whether this should be deleted. CoolSkittle (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Comment apologies for posting in the wrong place. The reason for nominating this is it’s confused. A search of sources shows Dorothy Heathcote did not devise the concept and once that is removed the remaining material is covered much more fully and coherently at Framing (social sciences). Mccapra (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete - Would say redirect to the Heathcote article as not enough substance for a stand-alone article, but this isn't mentioned there. Would say merge, but we only have a single broken citation to an apparent university course page. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete: no indication the term has caught on past Heathcote, Wikipedia isn't a collection of neologisms. SITH (talk) 03:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.