Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Viner

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as WP:CSD#A7 by Dloh cierekim . This was also speedily deleted in 2008 for the same reason.

=[[Francis Viner]]=

:{{la|Francis Viner}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Viner}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Francis Viner}})

A search on Google and Google News shows no independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability. The page appears to have been created with a conflict of interest and is only supported by self published sources or derivatives thereof. Ash (talk) 14:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 16:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete The article gives no independent sources at all, and no evidence of notability has been found by searching. (Note: The article was tagged for speedy deletion, the tag was removed by the author, restored by Kittensandrainbows, and then removed with the edit summary "Reverted good faith edits by Kittensandrainbows; Sorry, just raised to AfD before you reverted to PROD [sic] version". I have restored the tag again: I see no reason the article should not still be considered for speedy deletion.) JamesBWatson (talk) 16:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Please consider CONTESTED. Once a PROD has been deleted, for whatever reason, it is considered good practice to go to AfD if is there is a case for deletion. Ash (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy delete I am very tempted to speedy delete, as no claims of importance appear at all. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy delete No notability, links mostly to facebook/twitter/myspace (the evil trinity of wikipedia notability guidelines), and on top of that, written by the subject himself! Kittensandrainbows (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.