Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank J. Antoine
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
=[[Frank J. Antoine]]=
:{{la|Frank J. Antoine}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Frank J. Antoine}})
Non-notable failed candidate Orange Mike | Talk 00:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
:*Delete Does not GNG or NPOL as a failed candidate. My search could only find a book written by a relative so no significant coverage in reliable independent sources https://books.google.ca/books?id=mou6BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA118. The book ref only indicates he had an impact on his local town of roughly 5,000 people Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin . Cowlibob (talk) 03:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- A non-winning candidate for office does not qualify for a Wikipedia article on the basis of the candidacy itself — if they didn't win the election and thereby hold a notable office, then the only other path to a Wikipedia article is to demonstrate and source that they qualify for some other reason (e.g. holding a different notable office, or having preexisting notability in a different field of endeavour.) But no claim has been demonstrated, or even attempted, here — this is resting entirely on the failed candidacies themselves. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 14:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
:*Delete Doesn't meet general notability guildelines as far as I can tell. Capitalismojo (talk) 22:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence of notability. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.