Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franklin Clinton

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Franklin Clinton}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Franklin_Clinton Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Franklin Clinton}})

Was a redirect, then moved to draft, now moved back to mainspace. No real world notability, should be a redirect, but since some editors are insistent at creating articles for every fictional character ever written, here we are. This character's greatest claim to fame is they are the "sixth greatest Grand Theft Auto protagonist of all time". Not the greatest character, not the second greatest character. Not even the sixth greatest character, but the sixth greatest protagonist. Current sourcing is all primary, or about the actor who does the voice over, or brief blurbs. Searches did not turn up the type of in-depth coverage of real world notability needed to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of Grand Theft Auto V characters#Franklin Clinton. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect - No independent notability, though it is a viable search term. Sergecross73 msg me 17:03, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of Grand Theft Auto V characters#Franklin Clinton per Clarityfiend._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:26, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of Grand Theft Auto V characters#Franklin Clinton per above. Aoba47 (talk) 21:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of Grand Theft Auto V characters#Franklin Clinton when the only possible legitimate source outside of voice actor commentary with decent coverage is [https://www.geek.com/games/the-greatest-grand-theft-auto-protagonists-of-all-time-1724734/ Geek.com], and I'm not sure how trustworthy that site is. Regardless, one good independent piece on its own is simply not enough for a standalone article when WP:GNG requires multiple of such nature, but I agree with Sergecross73 that this is still a viable search term. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.