Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankston Iced Tea

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Frankston Iced Tea]]=

:{{la|Frankston Iced Tea}} ([{{fullurl:Frankston Iced Tea|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankston Iced Tea}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete—This topic is not notable; Google main turns up only wikipedia articles, and news searches turn up no hits. I can't think of a relevant CSD code for it, however. →If you have questions, please leave a comment on my talk page (JakeBathman) 20:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete, fails WP:V and WP:N. Procedural note: The AfD should run now, but in future you could use {{subst:prod|fails WP:N}} in cases like this.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 20:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind next time.→If you have questions, please leave a comment on my talk page (JakeBathman) 01:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Detele: non-notable drink receipt, completely unsourced. ww2censor (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete as neologism, no sources specified, Googling shows nothing. Looie496 (talk) 00:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete, or merge with Long Island Iced Tea. Bearian (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC) I've been bold and merged the text. Close early? Bearian (talk) 20:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.