Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frans van der Hoeven

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

=[[Frans van der Hoeven]]=

:{{la|Frans van der Hoeven}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Frans_van_der_Hoeven Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Frans van der Hoeven}})

Reason Yasima burundi (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC) this article does not meet Wikipedia notability Guidelines , NO third party Wikipedia reliable sources Yasima burundi (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep - If you had done WP:BEFORE you would have found all the third-party reliable sources. -- haminoon (talk) 21:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete: Despite what is said above, there seems to be confirmation of a very good, very active jazz bass player. There are passim references to him as a member of a rhythm section. It's kind of the fate of bass players to not be noticed, even when they're outstanding. Jaco Pastorius was flamboyant, outlandish, as well as a genius, and the wider public didn't really know about him until it was virtually too late. Asking for everyone to just admit that being a good player and a praised player is sufficient for a biographical and namespace article seems curious, especially when the recordings don't even give the labels, the dates, or anything else. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete - run-of-the-mill musician, article does not indicate why he should be notable, and is sourced to the subject's own website. Kraxler (talk) 00:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Delete Not notable Heyyouoverthere (talk) 05:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.