Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frazer Consultants

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under WP:G11. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR 20:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Frazer Consultants]]=

:{{la|Frazer Consultants}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Frazer_Consultants Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Frazer Consultants}})

Spam created by an account that appears to be the owner. Barely escapes the G11 threshold in my opinion, so I'm bringing it here for discussion. In short, this article is excluded from Wikipedia on two grounds: all the coverage is either not in-depth or is promotional, so it fails to establish notability per WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SPIP. The other is that it is spam created with the sole intent of promoting the enterprise, making it excluded from Wikipedia by WP:NOTSPAM, and failing the second prong of WP:N. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. The content is 100% promotional and created by a SPA Special:Contributions/MattGFrazer. Sources are trivial mentions or self-promotion, as in "Frazer Consultants Funeral Personalization Software Webinar a Success"! (via a Newswire press release). I requested speedy deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.