Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Archer (photographer)

=[[Fred Archer (photographer)]]=

:{{la|Fred Archer (photographer)}} ([{{fullurl:Fred Archer (photographer)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Archer (photographer)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Most of the article deals with the "zone system" which already has a substantial article of it's own. Subject seems to have no notability beyond that system. CarbonX (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Archer (photographer)||}}

Fred Archer (this one) was a notable Hollywood portrait photographer, and was instrumental in the development and use of still photopgraphy in Hollywood, and in it's use in advancing the film careers of various actors. The zone theory was not his most important contribution. His photos are now very rare, and very expensive. Michael Dawson covers him in LA's Early Moderns, and there is a small collection of his photos at the Goldwyn Hollywood Public Library. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstrehl (talkcontribs) 18:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 05:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Archer (photographer)||}}

  • Redirect per suggestion above and nom. Notable adpects of subject already covered in another article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.