Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Einesman
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Fred Einesman]]=
:{{la|Fred Einesman}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Fred Einesman}})
{{Not a ballot}}
BLP lacking references Rathfelder (talk) 20:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy keep Recruited to come here via [https://www.reddit.com/r/Assistance/comments/7b7cor/votes_needed_on_these_websites_limited_time_to/ this link]. --KalamazooGuy (talk) 13:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
::User:KalamazooGuy has been blocked for sockpuppetry. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. There are things here that could be potentially valid notability claims if he were properly sourced as the subject of enough reliable source coverage for them to clear WP:GNG, but there's nothing here that makes him an automatic must-include just because he exists. And I'm not finding any strong evidence that he's been the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear GNG, either. Bearcat (talk) 15:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per bearcat Fails WP:GNG lacks third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.