Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Joyal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

=[[Fred Joyal]]=

:{{la|Fred Joyal}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fred_Joyal Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Fred Joyal}})

Very promotional, so much so I don't know it can be saved. Usterday (talk) 00:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 17:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Delete Doesn't meet GNG; only references are in trade journals, and very specific to his line in dentistry. His main book held in only 5 libraries indicates that it didn't have wide-spread impact. LaMona (talk) 04:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete as no signs of convincingly better notability. Delete for now at best, SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.