Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederic Fappani
=[[Frederic Fappani]]=
:{{la|Frederic Fappani}} – (
:({{Find sources|Frederic Fappani}})
This appears to be cross-wiki spam which has been deleted twice from French Wikipedia, [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Frederic_Fappani/Suppression here] and [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric_Fappani/Suppression here] as non-notable. If he's not notable enough for French Wikipedia, he's certainly not notable enough for English Wikipedia. Yworo (talk) 15:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Sounds reasonable. Article is incoherent. Carrite (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment This same chunk of biography also appears in the (equally unreferenced) article :Archetypal_pedagogy#History. AllyD (talk) 20:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability. And if this goes, some follow-on housekeeping is probably worthwhile, as Fappani and his "archetypal pedagogy" have been knitted into various places. AllyD (talk) 20:40, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.