Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Iseman
=[[:Frederick Iseman]]=
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Iseman}}
:{{la|1=Frederick Iseman}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Frederick Iseman}})
This article is nominated for deletion due
to significant concerns regarding Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. The article
contains a large amount of outdated information but also details of financial details that put
this individual at personal risk. The subject is a private individual with borderline notability, and
the article's continued existence poses a risk of harm. I urge close consideration of WP:BLP and
WP:DELPRO in this matter. Balsamcedar123 (talk) 12:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Balsamcedar123
Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 23. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:44, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. I reformatted this AfD to remove stray square brackets. The {{tl|Find sources}} links should work now. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:10, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. I think he's notable. If information in the article is outdated, change that information to past tense. [https://news.artnet.com/art-world/lawsuit-against-helen-frankenthaler-foundation-is-dismissed-2537158 This article] and the related lawsuit are part of the reason why he's notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. I have removed the extra square brackets, it looks good now. Fade258 (talk) 14:17, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Businesspeople, and New York. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep I see no personal financial information that would put the subject at risk, and his past chairmanships are solved with past tense rather that outright removal. Nathannah • 📮 16:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – The subject does not have enough news coverage. The NY Times article is about his father, Joseph S. Iseman. The financial argument for removal however is not valid. I do not not see any sensitive finacial info in this article. Mysecretgarden (talk) 02:02, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
:
Relisting comment: I definitely don't think "details of financial details that put this individual at personal risk" is particularly valid here, but is there clear notability?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 06:34, 31 May 2025 (UTC)