Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeligious

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 06:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Freeligious]]=

:{{la|Freeligious}} ([{{fullurl:Freeligious|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeligious}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

A non-notable religious preference which fails WP:Notability. There are no "reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" available that can verify the article's notability (see Google search results [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22Freeligious%22&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=&fp=q07gBlqSm5s here]), and it therefore doesn't satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. TheLeft orium 11:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete Pure neologism. TN X Man 11:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete - madeup, neologism. Web searches for both "Freeligious" and "Freeligion" fall on stony ground. pablo_hablo. 12:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Neologism. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NEO. Also very advert-like in tone. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 21:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. '''--NovaSkola (talk) 05:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.