Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreelyCall
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Deor (talk) 12:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
=[[FreelyCall]]=
:{{la|FreelyCall}} – (
:({{Find sources|FreelyCall}})
Promo of a nn business -No.Altenmann >t 05:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 06:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
:Delete Nom has said everything. Op47 (talk) 23:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't even show up on google. LaMona (talk) 17:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't appear to pass our CORP guidelines. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. LHMask me a question 15:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - fails notability guidelines, lacks any sort of coverage/sources outside of the company website. Upjav (talk) 16:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:17, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.