Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/French naked

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

=[[French naked]]=

:{{la|French naked}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/French_naked Stats])

:({{Find sources|French naked}})

Non-notable slang. This isn't urban dictionary. Googled the phrase and didn't find anything of substance. Jrcla2 (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

:Delete. From my earlier PROD nomination: "Even if this is real, Wikipedia is not a dictionary and not a place for personal commentary by the author." —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:NOTDIC. Gobōnobō + c 07:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Article is notable. Google phrase and references as far back as 1930 can be found prolific use on social media in the twenty first century. Term is not always clearly understood and therefore clear description of background to phrase is notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stoobsw (talk • contribs) 20:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
  • It's still just a definition with an etymology, typically what's found in dictionaries rather than encyclopedias. To be suitable for an encyclopedia, there ought to be literature discussing the expression. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:28, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete, not because of WP:NOTDIC (since this article isn't a dicdef) but because not one of the sources given actually supports the claim that "French naked" means what this article claims it means. Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. Seems to be fantasy and original research. No sources to back up that this is a "common term". -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 02:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article is a hoax, pardon my French. None of the references given even use the phrase. Ich weiß dass nicht (talk) 01:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.