Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreshMen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[FreshMen]]=

:{{la|FreshMen}} ([{{fullurl:FreshMen|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreshMen}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No reliable third-party sources could be found to establish notability. Also fails WP:BK. I believe the only reason the article was created was because it was licensed for translation into English, which is not a notability criteria. Original prod was disputed by an IP editor. Farix (Talk) 02:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete, unnotable one-shot. Not even listed in Anime News Network's encyclopedia, nor JA Wiki. Fails WP:BK and allowed additional criteria at WP:MOS-AM of "Has been licensed by at least two publishers outside of Japan." -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:58, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 03:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm not finding evidence that this is anything more notable than any other series of its kind -- neither reviews nor that it'd been licensed in another language. That ja.wiki doesn't have an article strongly suggests no notability. Looks like it fails WP:BK, which means delete. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.