Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friendship Is Magic

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 1)#Episodes. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:49, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

=[[Friendship Is Magic]]=

:{{la|Friendship Is Magic}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Friendship_Is_Magic Stats])

:({{Find sources|Friendship Is Magic}})

Non-notable television episodes. There's enough information on these two episodes at My_Little_Pony:_Friendship_Is_Magic_(season_1). Beerest355 Talk 17:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 17:38, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 17:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

  • DeleteMerge + Redirect - As one that has done selected other episodes from the series, I've tried to see if I could find sources for the pilot and basically haven't had success to even come close to an article. --MASEM (t) 18:04, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Though I agree a merge is better, I will note that by naming schemes "Friendship Is Magic" as a common name should likely point to the series page. However, that's not an issue in the scope of this AFD. --MASEM (t) 23:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Merge if there's anything not already covered in the relevant entries of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 1)#Episodes, otherwise just redirect there. Jclemens (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Merge and Redirect as per above. While I agree that AFD is not typically used for "Articles I want to be a redirect", acknowledging that the title is worth redirecting is fine - and, on that point, this seems to be a clear case where a redirect would be beneficial. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.