Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Brush and Stone
=[[From Brush and Stone]]=
:{{la|From Brush and Stone}} – (
:({{Find sources|From Brush and Stone}})
Non-notable new release by two notable artists; no sourcing and serious NPOV problems of the "Gee, these guys did such good work, isn't it nice they've got a record out, even if nobody noticed" sort. Orange Mike | Talk 02:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NALBUMS. But rip out the POV Production section... the first Production section that is. Not the second. Dismas|(talk) 02:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep in agreement with Dismas above. The nominator's deletion rationale is more an indictment of the article's quality, rather than the album's notability. I am going to clean things up a bit. We could definitely use more sources, however, if anyone wants to help out. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
::If it matters, today's "anonymous" edits to the article were done by me but I didn't realize that I was not signed in. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.