Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuddle Cup

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 11:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

=[[Fuddle Cup]]=

:{{la|Fuddle Cup}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Fuddle Cup}})

No assertion of notability per WP:NBOOK; can't find a single mention of it online from WP:Reliable sources; ISBN given in first draft was incorrect, and I can't find an ISBN for it online; promotional article by book's author per WP:COI. Gurt Posh (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 09:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete- essentially spam for a non-notable self-published book. LadyofShalott 17:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy delete as pure spam. — RHaworth {{toolbar|separator=dot|talk | contribs }} 00:36, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete: Non-notable self-published book. Joe Chill (talk) 01:56, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.