Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full Belly Project

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Full Belly Project}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Full Belly Project}})

Declined prod. Only a handful of gnews hits and mostly from local press as per WP:AUD. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 08:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and North Carolina. LibStar (talk) 08:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
• Merge with Universal nut sheller: Organization seems to fail WP:ORG. Owen× ☎ 14:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
• Comment. Don't have time to look into this now, but I deprodded it because there are ~155 hits in Proquest for the quoted term, at least some of which looked to provide significant coverage. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep -- Innumerable high quality sources on gnews alone. I added three, sufficient to show that it satisfies GNG, let alone NORG. These are world-wide sources, not just local, not just regional. All are SIGCOV. Also see [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Full+Belly+Project%22 this google scholar search].Central and Adams (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.