Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full Rankings for Miss Dominican Republic

:{{la|Full Rankings for Miss Dominican Republic}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Full_Rankings_for_Miss_Dominican_Republic Stats])

:({{Find sources|Full Rankings for Miss Dominican Republic}})

useless list, no proof of notability and no sources The Banner talk 21:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:12, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

• This is an odd nomination, to question the notability of a beauty pageant by nominating one data list pertaining to it rather than the parent article or any of the individual pageant year articles. And "no sources" is not a deletion rationale. Are you claiming this national pageant's historical results are unverifiable? Seems that would require some proficiency in Spanish to make that determination, and again, that would compel nomination of the whole series of pageant year articles, not just this one.

  WP:IINFO is what you should be focusing on here, which is probably what you were getting to with your "useless list" unelaborated comment. Why is this data so important to the pageant topic such that it should be on Wikipedia? Does it matter how many winners different DR provinces have had in this pageant or is this just trivia? There are already multiple tables listing the basic data of province rankings in Miss Dominican Republic, for each of the four titles into which this pageant was apparently split, so this seems to be at best redundant, and unnecessary detail otherwise. postdlf (talk) 16:44, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

---

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (babble) @ 20:55, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

---

• Delete per nom. Utterly unnecessary. Nobody outside of contestants and their families is remotely interested. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:28, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.