Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fully connected network

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A basic computer networking concept, also the nominator has not given a reason that why a source is required, also merging can be discussed later. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 11:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

=[[Fully connected network]]=

:{{la|Fully connected network}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Fully connected network}})

without references September 2006 Drift chambers (talk) 18:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Keep. This is one of the most basic concepts in networking, and there is no reason to delete it. Nikola (talk) 14:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Keep This can be merged somewhere, but that can be discussed on the talk page. —Ruud 21:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to Complete graph. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:18, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Keep. A basic networking concept. Merging can be discussed later, as Ruud points out above.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Merge, perhaps redirect - this is a Content Fork of Complete graph, perfectly good stuff but not justifying yet another (tiny) Network article. No need to keep in the hope of sorting out the mess later! Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
:What? That would be like redirecting barrel to cylinder. The latter is a mathematical concept, while the former is an application of the mathematical concept. Nikola (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Redirect - to complete graph. There isn't much to merge, and seem to cover the same thing. Also, not being referenced is not a reason to delete an article. →Σ τ c. 02:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Keep The nomination fails to explain why a source is required but here's one anyway which has similar content: [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VQvhAN9iBuMC&pg=PA24 Fully connected networks]. Warden (talk) 20:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Keep as per Rudd and WP:BEFORE section C.5. --Kvng (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Merge and redirect into Network topology#Mesh, where the topic is already discussed in an appropriate context. Complete graph is not a good merge target, as it refers to an abstract mathematical concept. -- 202.124.72.106 (talk) 00:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.