Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funnerific

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lenticel ^(talk) 02:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Funnerific]]=

:{{la|Funnerific}} ([{{fullurl:Funnerific|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funnerific}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Declined prod. Article appears to be a dictionary definition of a neologism and "funnerific" does not seem to be a topic that satisfies our notability guidelines. Skomorokh 22:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete (neologism) or transwiki to urbandictionary. Oh, wait, we can't do that? Baileypalblue (talk) 23:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete trash. JuJube (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Speedy as obvious vandalism. Robots? Cavemen? The Jetsons? Come on. Graymornings_(talk) 01:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleteriffic — non-notable neologism in the slightest, as well as a poorly-created dictionary definition, which doesn't even belong here in the first place. MuZemike 01:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 02:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete as per Edward321 Camw (talk) 02:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete - non-notable neologism. Matt (Talk) 03:29, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Snowball delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleterrific. JBsupreme (talk) 09:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.