Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuser (band) (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. There is some concern here bacause this debate was so lightly attended and the bundled in derivative articles were not tagged as being listed here. Nevertheless, since nobody has stepped up in two weeks to comment in favor of keeping the band article it seems appropriate to delete it and the derivative articles. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Fuser (band)]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuser (band)}}

:{{la|Fuser (band)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fuser_(band)_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Fuser (band)}})

Non-notable band, no source to support only charted single. I went through the New Zealand Top 40 archives for the charts of the years 2005 and 2006 and found nothing regarding this band's "single". Their only entry on Discogs is being included in a compilation released outside of New Zealand given out for free by a British magazine. —Ryulong (琉竜) 06:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Obviously if this gets deleted, the related articles {{la|Fuser (album)}} and {{la|The EP (Fuser EP)}} will have to go too.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete has nothing to merit keeping, not notable at this stage NealeFamily (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:47, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.