Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futility as Tragedy: an Interpretation of Hamlet
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Futility as Tragedy: an Interpretation of Hamlet]]=
:{{la|Futility as Tragedy: an Interpretation of Hamlet}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Futility as Tragedy: an Interpretation of Hamlet}})
Apparently self-promotional article on book that fails to meet general notability; only edited by someone that appears to be either the book's author or someone affiliated with them; and orphaned for the last eight years. Xover (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A promotional article on a non-notable book that was self-published. It contains no reliable sources that show that this particular book was every notable, and searching comes up with nothing but mirrors of this article, or sales pages to buy it. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a clear listing complete with the last sentences, nothing policy-convincing. SwisterTwister talk 23:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete due to age and PROMO. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 22:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per the above, for lack of obvious notability. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.