Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuwdo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Fuwdo]]=

:{{la|Fuwdo}} ([{{fullurl:Fuwdo|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuwdo}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Seemingly non-notable group. The NME "reference" is ~~a page-not-found error~~ user-generated content from YouTube. tomasz. 17:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: myspace band, no 3rd party notability. JamesBurns (talk) 04:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment The NME showed up fine for me. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

:Comment. Sorry, you're absolutely right. There must have been a temporary problem when i looked at it. It is, however, as i suspected it might be, Web 2.0 content from the YouTubes and thus still not a good source by our standards. Cheers for the tip-off, tomasz. 11:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete - no sources to establish notability. 3 EPs released independently with no apparent coverage that can be found. -- Whpq (talk) 00:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.