Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzz Academy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Marie Lu. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Fuzz Academy]]=

:{{la|1=Fuzz Academy}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Fuzz Academy}})

Can't find a lick of reliable secondary coverage apart from a one sentence in an NPR profile of the creator, a successful author. I've added mention to the creator's biography based on that source. This can go. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 04:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Internet. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 04:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:Redirect to Marie Lu, where nom added a cited mention. ~ A412 ^talk! 04:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

::Agreed, good WP:ATD. IgelRM (talk) 18:06, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:I don’t think this page should be deleted. The creator’s Deviant Art Account has information about the site, under the username “mree”. There is little record of Fuzz Academy beyond their art uploads and commentary about the game in their posts. One day there may be even less record of it’s existence, save for a little stubby Wikipedia article - but at least it won’t become entirely lost media. Some of us still hold these forgotten, defunct games in our hearts, and to lose record of their existence is a saddening thought. 173.184.50.33 (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

::You should copy this article, with attribution, to an appropriate wiki related to video games or internet culture or something like that. You can also just save it and republish it (with attribution) on a blog, or as a Reddit post, or something. But to be included on Wikipedia, reliable sources need to demonstrate a topic’s notability, and Fuzz Academy does not meet this standard. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 06:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Delete: Was briefly active a decade ago, then nothing mentioned since. A reddit sub and some trademark registrations are about all I pull up, nothing notable about the website. Oaktree b (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Sourcing is poor and notability is not established. Reads like an advertisement. Ramos1990 (talk) 05:54, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:*Delete. Poor sourcing and non-existent plausible sigcov. MimirIsSmart (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.