Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fynn Hudson-Prentice

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:41, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

=[[Fynn Hudson-Prentice]]=

:{{la|Fynn Hudson-Prentice}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Fynn Hudson-Prentice}})

Not yet notable junior cricketer, almost certainly an autobio, Prod removed by article creator without explanation. The-Pope (talk) 03:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete Does not satisfy Cricket notability standards nor basic sports criteria with no significant coverage evident of secondary sources. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 05:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 06:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete. In general, notable sportspeople need to play in either the fully professional game or the highest level of amateur sports (usually meaning world championships or Olympics). At the moment, this is neither. Should Fynn Hudson-Prentice play for the professional game one day, this article still needs deleting and starting again because it has no regard to neutral point of view. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete. No sign of coverage in reliable sources as 0 hits in Google News, Books & Scholar. An unsourced recently-created WP:BLP, so Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people could have been used. Qwfp (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.