Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G'vine

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[:G'vine]]=

:{{la|G'vine}} - (View AfD)(View log)

Delete

The links provided do not show evidence of notability, as they are largely blogs - and unheard of ones at that. There is no third party coverage/press etc to evidence WP:GNG

Having looked into the links a bit further - there is evidence of fakery - see this one: http://www.luxist.com/2006/12/25/gvine-gin/

most of the comments are transparently faked - not very impressive at all...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterS2009 (talk • contribs) 2010/03/02 16:48:31

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete for lack of notability. The articles used as references, fake comments and all, prove that the Gin exists, which is fine, but we need to show that it's notable. I can't find sources to do it, nor do I believe that they exist. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.