Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-funk

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[G-funk]]=

:{{la|G-funk}} ([{{fullurl:G-funk|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-funk}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This is pure unadulterated original research and should thus be deleted. JBsupreme (talk) 08:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep Useful article that just needs a clean up. - Sorfane 17:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable subgenre of hip hop music. The article needs improvement in terms of sources, but that can be dealt with through regular editing. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep you've got to be joking. JuJube (talk) 02:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - not really up for debate, quite clearly a notable sub-genre of hip hop. Not even a debate. However, the article could do with being tidied up, verging on a major overhaul, but it definitely has to stay. GillsMan (talk) 22:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.